HR8799
The tri-planet has been observed on 3 nights: 20110612, 20110613, 20110615. A preliminary analysis suggests however the possibility that data collected on 20110613 are not usable (due to possible low accuracy of the telescope pointing, to be verified with a further analysis). The very last acquisition 20110615_113906 is done with ADI and consists of 30 exposure of 10s.
!! all J images (20110613) show a bright source on the right of the main star in the field. This has been labeled as "ghost", likely due to internal reflections or similar. Averaging several images, a third, much fainter, reflection becomes visible, then enforcing the idea of the ghost.
A round object is noticeable on datasets 20110612 and 20110615, located 85 pix far from the star center, pos angle=60° (just below the main diffraction arm). Such distance is approx 1.7arcsec and is compatible to HR8799b as discussed in the literature. Drawing a circle of a radius matching that of HR8799d, we realized that the d planet cannot be identified as that portion of the image is saturated (no scatter in counts, ADU level flat at 32000: is this the effect of the CDS as discussed in the general comment page?). Possibly, a shorter exposure time (and wider sampling) could help: also, HR8799d should be much brighter than the b companion.
The same stands for HR8799c. It should be found at the edge of the saturated area, hence in a maybe more easy position...
The 20110615_113906 dataset has been processed considering the ADI data reduction. However, the field rotated by 2° only.
* Planets (from Marois & al, Nature 08 December 2010):
Raw data
12 June
13 June
15 June
Dark images
20110615_120453_pisces.cq.fits: 30x10s sky images in H band. Good for 20110615_113906 (... not so much: as it is a Sky frame, the # of counts is very large as the twilight is arriving..)