SX QC and Pyramid co-pointing
We switch on the AGW and we configure it to be used with IS. FW1: 600-1000, we center on QC.
Then we offset the
TipTilt mirror by [2.2; 2.1]V, corresponding to the position measured in August 2015 during the QC alignment.
We measure the range of FW2 positions that do not vignette the QC beam: -0.02 - 0.13 filter positions. Instead the range of positions for FW2 that are able to feed the QC are: -0.015 - 0.015.
Since FW2 has 6 filters (60deg/filter) we get that 1milli filter corresponds to about 1mrad of tilt. The distance between QC and FW2 is about 150mm, so 1mfilter corresponds to about 80mas on-sky. Considering a positioning accuracy of 3mfilter for the FW2 this corresponds to 150mas of co-pointing error on-sky due to FW2 histeresys. A lambda/D on the Pyramid tip corresponds to about 30mas. The co-pointing error due to FW2 misplacement is about 5 lambda/D, comparable with the modulation diameter...
We scan various LUCI rotator positions and we check the modulation offset that allow to co-point PYR and QC. Moreover we check if moving FW2 we can minimize the co-pointing offset:
Rot |
PI |
FW2 |
Notes |
345 |
[1.6; 4.4] |
-0.002 |
|
[1.7; 4.7] |
[0.0] |
|
[0.5; >5.0] |
0.003 |
|
[2.2; 2.1] |
-0.007 |
|
255 |
[2.2; 2.1] |
0.003 |
we've lost 1/3 of light wrt -0.007 |
165 |
[0.6; 3.0] |
-0.007 |
we cannot co-point with [2.2; 2.1] |
75 |
[-0.80; 0.3] |
-0.007 |
we cannot co-point with [2.2; 2.1] |
We notice that flux on QC is increasing with FW2 position going from + to -: for example we have 100% flux at -0.007, 125% at -0.015 and 50% at 0.005. This effect is independent of rotator position.
We test the QC in closed loop from AARB w/o disturb. Co-point in truth sensing seems to work. Working at 75deg of LUCI rotator angle we have a co-pointing offset of [-0.5, 0.5]V.
We test the QC also with 1" equivalent disturb, using old (December) rec:
Since the ASM is skipping when 1" disturb is applied we try to reduce the alignment coma using the haxapod. After optimization:
SX Hexa |
4.65 |
1.77 |
-0.71 |
8 |
-107 |
Board |
-75 |
-48 |
45 |
|
|
We close again with 1" disturb:
Since co-pointing can work between -15 and 165deg of LUCI rotator we try to close the loop on QC in these positions, checking the co-pointing convergence:
Rot |
Board |
PI |
75 |
[-75; 48] |
[2.2; 2.1] |
30 |
[-74.5; -50] |
[1.3; 1.6] |
0 |
[-74.4; - 51.5] |
[2.3; 2.0] |
-15 |
[-74.5; -52.5] |
[3.0; 2.1] |
165 |
[-79.4; -49.6] |
[0.77; -3.0] |
While closing loop at different rotator angles we also acquired snapshots:
TN |
AO Gain |
Res. WF [nm rms] |
AO rec |
DIMM ["] |
JCL |
PCL |
Notes |
20160311_193753 |
2,0.45,0.45 |
98.1175 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
75deg |
20160311_193923 |
2,0.45,0.45 |
98.7126 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
20160311_213447 |
1,0.4,0.3 |
68.7564 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
0deg |
20160311_213516 |
1,0.4,0.3 |
64.1665 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
20160311_214225 |
0.2,0.1,0.05 |
78.831 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
-15deg |
20160311_214248 |
0.2,0.1,0.05 |
84.0563 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
20160311_215056 |
1,0.4,0.3 |
58.2939 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
165deg |
20160311_215114 |
1,0.4,0.3 |
59.6251 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
Then we close with a 1" disturb, source is equivalent to mag10 star:
TN |
AO Gain |
Res. WF [nm rms] |
AO rec |
DIMM ["] |
JCL |
PCL |
Notes |
20160311_215502 |
1,0.4,0.3 |
72.7737 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
|
20160311_215815 |
1,0.4,0.3 |
75.9512 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
|
20160311_215910 |
1,0.4,0.3 |
75.5551 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
|
20160311_220025 |
1,0.4,0.3 |
77.5041 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
|
Then we reduce the flux to test the truth sensig at magnitude 16:
TN |
AO Gain |
Res. WF [nm rms] |
AO rec |
DIMM ["] |
JCL |
PCL |
Notes |
20160311_225330 |
0.5,0.3,0.1 |
63.924 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
w/o dist |
20160311_225359 |
0.5,0.3,0.1 |
65.7635 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
20160311_225531 |
1,0.4,0.4 |
83.072 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
1" dist |
20160311_225551 |
1,0.4,0.4 |
85.7034 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
20160311_225619 |
1,0.4,0.4 |
86.4308 |
20160310_213600 |
-1 |
T |
F |
WhiteLightSource SX to Pyramid magnitude calibration
We scan the white light source aperture and we check the equivalent magnitude on the pyramid:
WLS steps |
303 |
80 |
70 |
65 |
60 |
55 |
50 |
45 |
40 |
Pyr mag (600-1000) |
- |
10 |
11 |
11.5 |
13.5 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
Pyr mag (90-10) |
11.5 |
12 |
13 |
13.5 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
QC hot spot on CCD47
We checked the CCD47 pixel corresponding to QC tip: FW1: silver mirror (#4), FW2: empty (#1) -> [34; 42] @ BIN16.
We aligned the
LgswUnitDx to the calibration unit.
We ended up to a limit position were the decenter Y of the hexapod was hitting the limit; we have less coma with respect to yesterday, but not null
DX Hexa |
-5.95 |
-7.6 |
0.95 |
145 |
-20 |
0 |
We feed all the three Lgsw and we acquired a 10 modes interaction matrix with KL_v21
IM |
REC |
COMBO |
20160311_204825 |
20160311_205800 |
20160311_205900 |
We closed the AO loop without disturbance with the jitter initial position 20160311_210436 and the pupil motors in :
BEAM |
X |
Y |
BLUE |
415 |
515 |
YELLOW |
205 |
370 |
RED |
435 |
345 |
We do a sweep of +/-6" in 11 steps and we measured the FOV center of the BLUE
We do a sweep of +/-6" in 11 steps around the RED FOV center estimated from the previous image and we measured the FOV center of the RED
We updated the procedure in order to obtain a squared grid of the hexapod movements.
We did a sweep of +/-8" in 7 steps around the YELLOW FOV center estimated from the first image and we measured the FOV center of the YELLOW;
BEAM |
[Rx; Ry] |
Blue |
[138.6; -20.1] |
Yellow |
[142.12; -19.16] |
Red |
[147; -24] |
We defined a new subapertures set to align the center of the FOV to the center of the subapertures and minimize the jitter offset.
The new set is 20160311_234700.
Since we cannot shift the BLUE subapertures in the x direction, we change the pointing moving the hexapod
The new BLUE hexapod position is
DX Hexa |
-5.95 |
-7.6 |
0.95 |
141 |
-22 |
1.41 |
We also changed the BLUE pupil motor position
BEAM |
X |
Y |
BLUE |
410 |
530 |
YELLOW |
205 |
370 |
RED |
435 |
345 |
We recorded a new IM for the SX QC using the AGW IS.
The scan seems not very good, it is not passing by the center of the QC, so we refine the source centering on the QC and acquire a new IM. QC speed is 500Hz, Pyramid (TS) speed is 100Hz.
We change FW1 to 600-1000 to be able to ramp up the IS and acquire the IM at 1kHz: 20160312_032258. But this new one is worse because we have a double spot on QC.
--
TommasoMazzoni - 12 Mar 2016